BurstNET和Linode VPS的UnixBench测试

888 views 六月 14, 10 by Timothy

今晚试了试UnixBench在VPS上的测试，想比较下BurstNET和Linode的VPS的差异。
首先要准备一下测试环境，下载和编译一下UnixBench。这次测试我分别用了UnixBench 4.1.0版，和最新的UnixBench 5.1.2版。
下载及编译UnixBench:

?View Code BASH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7

  wget http://members.dslextreme.com/users/andylee/unixbench-4.1.0-wht.tar.gz
  tar zxvf unixbench-4.1.0-wht.tar.gz
  #解压后，得到一个unixbench-4.1.0-wht-2的目录，进入目录，然后编译unixbench
  cd unixbench-4.1.0-wht-2
  make
  #编译完成后，运行
  ./Run

这里还要注意一下，如果运行时出错，提示：Please install /usr/bin/time. 的话，需要安装time

?View Code BASH
1

  apt-get install time

UnixBench 5.1.2版的编译方法类似，如果在编译时出现错误，提示找不到X11一类的库的时候，需要编辑Makefile，将 GRAPHIC_TESTS = defined 这一行注释掉即可，因为对于VPS，不需要对显卡进行测试。

这样，编译完成之后，就可以开始运行测试了。整个过程大概持续十几分钟，最终的结果就会出来。

BurstNET VPS 配置： CPU 单核 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q8200 @ 2.33GHz 2MB二级缓存，512MB内存，20G硬盘
Linode VPS 配置： CPU 四核 Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5520 @ 2.27GHz 每核8MB二级缓存，360MB内存，16 G硬盘

linode UnixBench4.1.0得分:

Start Benchmark Run: Sun Jun 13 23:52:56 CST 2010

23:52:56 up 7 days,  4:34,  2 users,  load average: 0.84, 3.10, 2.03

End Benchmark Run: Mon Jun 14 00:03:44 CST 2010

00:03:44 up 7 days,  4:45,  2 users,  load average: 15.07, 6.48, 3.71

INDEX VALUES
TEST                                                          BASELINE     RESULT      INDEX

Dhrystone 2 using register variables        376783.7   18549224.1      492.3

Double-Precision Whetstone                      83.1        1075.3      129.4

Execl Throughput                                        188.3       271.3       14.4

File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks     2672.0     183122.0      685.3

File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks         1077.0    46095.0      428.0

File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks     15382.0  2248347.0     1461.7

Pipe Throughput                                         111814.6  1426039.0      127.5

Pipe-based Context Switching                   15448.6   153447.5       99.3

Process Creation                                          569.3       4589.7       80.6

Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                         44.8         1257.8      280.8

System Call Overhead                                  114433.5  1138915.6       99.5

=========

FINAL SCORE                                                              189.4

BurstNET UnixBench4.1.0得分：

Start Benchmark Run: Sun Jun 13 15:44:53 UTC 2010

15:44:53 up 17 days, 20:22,  1 user,  load average: 0.61, 0.68, 0.43

End Benchmark Run: Sun Jun 13 16:11:34 UTC 2010

16:11:34 up 17 days, 20:49,  1 user,  load average: 14.26, 6.00, 3.34

INDEX VALUES
TEST                                                            BASELINE     RESULT      INDEX

Dhrystone 2 using register variables        376783.7  5393975.4      143.2

Double-Precision Whetstone                      83.1     1229.0      147.9

Execl Throughput                                      188.3     3386.5      179.8

File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks         2672.0   172137.0      644.2

File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           1077.0    67889.0      630.4

File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        15382.0   833087.0      541.6

Pipe-based Context Switching                 15448.6   233051.2      150.9

Pipe Throughput                                        111814.6   650442.2       58.2

Process Creation                                         569.3     9861.9      173.2

Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                        44.8      317.0       70.8

System Call Overhead                                114433.5   586353.5       51.2

=========

FINAL SCORE                                                     174.7
Linode UnixBench 5.1.2得分：

BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)

System: li165-157: GNU/Linux

OS: GNU/Linux — 2.6.32.12-linode25 — #1 SMP Wed Apr 28 19:25:11 UTC 2010

Machine: i686 (unknown)

Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”UTF-8″, collate=”UTF-8″)

CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5520 @ 2.27GHz (4533.5 bogomips)

Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext

CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5520 @ 2.27GHz (4533.5 bogomips)

Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext

CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5520 @ 2.27GHz (4533.5 bogomips)

Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext

CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5520 @ 2.27GHz (4533.5 bogomips)

Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext

00:10:48 up 7 days,  4:52,  2 users,  load average: 0.08, 1.57, 2.34; runlevel 2

————————————————————————

Benchmark Run: Mon Jun 14 2010 00:10:48 – 00:38:47

4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       14795997.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

Double-Precision Whetstone                     2104.9 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples)

Execl Throughput                               1114.3 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)

File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        289394.9 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)

File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           76973.1 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)

File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        807122.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)

Pipe Throughput                              418521.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

Pipe-based Context Switching                  21882.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

Process Creation                               2082.0 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)

Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   2704.7 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)

Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    703.4 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)

System Call Overhead                         430386.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX

Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   14795997.6   1267.9

Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       2104.9    382.7

Execl Throughput                                 43.0       1114.3    259.1

File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     289394.9    730.8

File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0      76973.1    465.1

File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     807122.7   1391.6

Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     418521.2    336.4

Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0      21882.3     54.7

Process Creation                                126.0       2082.0    165.2

Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       2704.7    637.9

Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        703.4   1172.4

System Call Overhead                          15000.0     430386.2    286.9

========

System Benchmarks Index Score                                         429.0

————————————————————————

Benchmark Run: Mon Jun 14 2010 00:38:47 – 01:07:04

4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       51437080.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

Double-Precision Whetstone                     7900.6 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples)

Execl Throughput                               4048.4 lps   (29.9 s, 2 samples)

File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        279522.6 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)

File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           74109.8 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)

File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       1020171.1 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)

Pipe Throughput                             1495820.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

Pipe-based Context Switching                 165631.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

Process Creation                               4516.0 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)

Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   5624.7 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)

Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    862.6 lpm   (60.2 s, 2 samples)

System Call Overhead                        1451308.5 lps   (10.1 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX

Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   51437080.2   4407.6

Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       7900.6   1436.5

Execl Throughput                                 43.0       4048.4    941.5

File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     279522.6    705.9

File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0      74109.8    447.8

File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    1020171.1   1758.9

Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    1495820.1   1202.4

Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     165631.7    414.1

Process Creation                                126.0       4516.0    358.4

Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       5624.7   1326.6

Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        862.6   1437.6

System Call Overhead                          15000.0    1451308.5    967.5

========

System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1007.3

BurstNET UnixBench 5.1.2得分：

BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)

System: vps.xiaozhou.net: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 2.6.18-128.2.1.el5.028stab064.4 — #1 SMP Mon Jul 27 12:45:01 MSD 2009
Machine: i686 (unknown)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”UTF-8″, collate=”UTF-8″)
CPU 0: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q8200 @ 2.33GHz (4670.1 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
02:29:02 up 18 days,  7:06,  1 user,  load average: 0.16, 0.16, 0.17; runlevel 2

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Mon Jun 14 2010 02:29:02 – 03:13:12
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       11339207.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     2260.5 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               3362.8 lps   (29.6 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        319380.6 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          113284.5 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        807667.8 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                              684264.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 234582.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               9991.1 lps   (30.1 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   2967.0 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    381.1 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                         602393.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   11339207.7    971.7
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       2260.5    411.0
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       3362.8    782.0
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     319380.6    806.5
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     113284.5    684.5
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     807667.8   1392.5
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     684264.4    550.1
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     234582.0    586.5
Process Creation                                126.0       9991.1    792.9
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       2967.0    699.8
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        381.1    635.2
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     602393.1    401.6
========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         686.5

看来在单核CPU测试下，Linode并不占据太大优势，甚至得分低于BurstNET，估计是因为Linode内存比BurstNET小的缘故。在并行测试中，四核CPU明显有一定的优势，在能充分利用多核性能，所以得分较高。

最后，附上UnixBench在Google Code的地址： http://code.google.com/p/byte-unixbench/

分享到：

声明: 此Blog中的文章和随笔仅代表作者在某一特定时间内的观点和结论，对其完全的正确不做任何担保或假设
本站文章均采用 知识共享署名-相同方式共享3.0 协议进行授权，除非注明，本站文章均为原创，转载请注明转自 Timothy's Space 并应以链接形式标明本文地址!

你可能也对下列文章感兴趣


Add your comment

10 Responses to "BurstNET和Linode VPS的UnixBench测试"

  1. lonkil CHINA Google Chrome Windows 说道：
    2010年06月14日 3:34 上午

    一到周未就折腾，厉害。

    回复
  2. 久酷 CHINA Mozilla Firefox Windows 说道：
    2010年06月14日 8:15 上午

    HOHO………….两个VPS一起玩啦

    回复
  3. 林木木 CHINA Google Chrome Windows 说道：
    2010年06月14日 5:38 下午

    完全不懂，纯路过的~

    回复
  4. hi-vps Mozilla Firefox Windows 说道：
    2011年07月29日 4:07 下午

    这是我的一个客户用unixbench4做的评测:
    http://blog.cogipard.org/articles/benchmark-of-hivps512-and-linode512-and-ramhost192
    如果需要的话可以联系我,会免费提供一个测试用的VPS账户.

    回复
  5. Magento定制 CHINA Mozilla Firefox Windows 说道：
    2011年08月12日 10:52 下午

    Linode速度明显比BurstNet的快，价格也高出不少。

    回复

Leave a Reply

 您已输入0字

(Ctrl+Enter)